Cover image for Having faith : an ecologist's journey to motherhood
Having faith : an ecologist's journey to motherhood
Steingraber, Sandra.
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
Cambridge, Mass. : Perseus Pub., 2001.
Physical Description:
xii, 341 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
General Note:
"A Merloyd Lawrence book."
Reading Level:
1150 Lexile.
Format :


Call Number
Material Type
Home Location
Item Holds
RG556 .S74 2001 Adult Non-Fiction Non-Fiction Area

On Order



A brilliant writer, first-time mother, and respected biologist, Sandra Steingraber tells the month-by-month story of her own pregnancy, weaving in the new knowledge of embryology, the intricate development of organs, the emerging architecture of the brain, and the transformation of the mother's body to nourish and protect the new life. At the same time, she shows all the hazards that we are now allowing to threaten each precious stage of development, including the breast-feeding relationship between mothers and their newborns. In the eyes of an ecologist, the mother's body is the first environment, the mediator between the toxins in our food, water, and air and her unborn child.Never before has the metamorphosis of a few cells into a baby seemed so astonishingly vivid, and never before has the threat of environmental pollution to conception, pregnancy, and even to the safety of breast milk been revealed with such clarity and urgency. In Having Faith, poetry and science combine ina passionate call to action.A Merloyd Lawrence Book

Author Notes

Sandra Steingraber, Ph.D. received her doctorate in biological sciences from the University of Michigan and taught biology for several years at Columbia College, Chicago. The recipient of several awards for science writing, Steingraber was named a Ms. Magazine "Woman of the Year" in 1997. Recently, as part of international treaty negotiations, she briefed United Nations delegates in Geneva on breast milk contamination. She has been selected as the 2001 recipient of the Rachel Carson Leadership Award from Carson's alma mater, Chatham College. Currently on the faculty at Cornell University, she lives in Ithaca, New York, with her husband, the sculptor Jeff de Castro, and their daughter, Faith

Reviews 4

Publisher's Weekly Review

Steingraber (Living Downstream) offers the commonest of stories how she got pregnant, gave birth and fed her baby in a most uncommon way. A cross between the quirkily thorough detail of Natalie Angier's science-writing and the passionate environmental advocacy of Rachel Carson, Steingraber's style would have been insufferably heroic if the pregnancy had been smooth, mind-over-matter. Instead, it's one long tale of everywoman's worst moments from the urge-to-pee problem to the terrible nausea of morning sickness followed by "round ligament pain" (these are "the bungee cords that anchor the uterus in place"), Braxton-Hicks contractions (which "rehearse the body for labor") and the general nuttiness of each trimester of pregnancy. Readers can identify with being ideologically opposed to, say, episiotomies, but then agreeing to one under the duress of childbirth. The climax, however, is not her daughter Faith's birth, but the dilemma over the safety of breastfeeding. The medical benefits of breast milk are compelling: it provides excellent nutrition and important immunities. But with rising environmental pollution, biomagnification implies that deadly toxins like DDT and dioxin will concentrate in human milk, the top of the food chain. The only answer: fight this pollution and make the world safer for nursing babies. With humor Steingraber compares childbirth to rocking a car out of a snowdrift or angling big furniture through a small doorway to leaven the scientific forays, this is a positively riveting narrative. Parents-to-be or anyone concerned with environmental pollution will want to read and discuss this and act. (Nov.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

Choice Review

Steingraber, a trained ecologist, narrates her first pregnancy and childbirth chronologically in a month-by-month format (i.e., nine chapters) in which she describes the stages of fetal development. She also discusses morning sickness, birth defects, and the effects of various pollutants on the fetus--especially on brain development. Hence, the author sees her own body as an ecological environment in which she tries to nurture and protect her infant from hazardous environmental toxicants. In the second section, she details the effects of maternal breastfeeding on nursing infants. Here, the beneficial and disease-protecting properties of breast milk and its stimulation of brain development are explored and contrasted to the environmental pollutants found in breast milk due to food chain contamination by toxic chemicals. The book dwells on the threats posed by environmental pollutants on the fetus during pregnancy and by breastfeeding during early neonatal development. The author explores how toxic chemicals cross the placental barrier and, by contaminating the amniotic fluid and mother's breast milk, compromise various stages of infant development. Readers will appreciate the source notes at the end of the book, which provide additional references. All levels. H. S. Pitkow emeritus, Temple University

Booklist Review

Steingraber, an ecologist who became pregnant at age 38, describes her experience as becoming a habitat: "My uterus was an inland ocean with a population of one." From the time she recalls taking an at-home pregnancy test in the faculty bathroom of the university where she is teaching--and delightfully digresses to the history of pregnancy tests and age-old accounts of nausea during pregnancy--Steingraber grips the reader with her beautifully descriptive, highly informative narrative. This inward, scientific exploration of pregnancy is divided into two sections: the first part explores fetal development and issues for the expectant mother, including choices for treatment and delivery; the second part focuses on the biological bond between mother and child that is formed during breastfeeding. Steingraber contrasts her own scientific knowledge with the advice offered in popular books on pregnancy, going back and forth when hard knowledge or encouragement is required. Using her own dogged personal investigations, she reveals new information on pregnancy and childbirth, including environmental hazards to mothers and babies. A fabulous book that imparts much more than what is offered in standard pregnancy tomes. --Vanessa Bush

Library Journal Review

According to many popular guidebooks, pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting are happy experiences that proceed smoothly to bliss and contentment. Wolf and Steingraber beg to differ. Both feminist writer Wolf (The Beauty Myth) and Steingraber (Living Downstream: A Scientist's Personal Investigation of Cancer and the Environment), an ecologist at Cornell University, feel that consumer guides do not offer women enough information about the reality of the birth process. They argue that childbirth preparation classes make medical intervention seem harmless, normal, and expected. This leads women to stop trusting themselves and their bodies, allowing physicians to take control. But while the two authors agree about some issues, their respective books look at their own pregnancies from different points of view. Wolf focuses on how the psychological and social aspects of pregnancy and impending motherhood changed her sense of self. Coming from a generation of women who identify themselves as independent, equal, and entitled to power, she felt a sense of loss despite having wanted a child. She also began to reexamine some of her basic beliefs about a woman's right to choose and the balance of power in relationships. Wolf concludes that society neither values nor supports parents despite its emphasis on family values. (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.



Chapter One Old Moon January In a faculty bathroom on the campus of Illinois Wesleyan University, I am trying to pee on a stick. Outside, the first snowfall of winter is coming down thick and fast, which is a good thing because I have a seminar to teach downstairs in five minutes, and the snow--with all the required stomping of boots and shaking of scarves--should keep the class preoccupied for a while.     When I was a student here myself, twenty years ago, I always wondered what went on in private, professorial chambers like this one. Now that I have returned for a semester as a visiting writer-in-residence, accompanied by my visiting artist-in-residence husband, I've been walking through lots of familiar old buildings and opening doors to rooms I never knew existed. The provost's inner office, for instance. The faculty dining hall. And now this dark-paneled, wide-windowed lavatory with its crooked floor and oversized porcelain fixtures.     I focus on the chortling sounds of the radiator. Urine splashes over my fingers, and I feel the stick bend down like a divining rod.     In my office, a few minutes earlier, I finished an interview with the alumni magazine editor, during which time I was completely absorbed with the question of whether or not I was pregnant. My period is not due for another two days, and yet I have a hunch. So as soon as he left, I walked across the street to the pharmacy where, as a college student, I had bought contraceptive devices. I used to stand in the checkout lane and worry that one of my professors would walk in and see me with a handful of condoms and spermicides. Today, with the same air of fake casualness, I sidled up to that identical counter holding a home pregnancy test kit, hoping that none of my students would walk in before the clerk could slip that too-pink box safely into a bag.     I lay the wet stick on the cool, curved lip of the sink basin. White on white, it seems to vanish.     I hadn't really planned to do this right now. But I was amazed, after reading the directions on the back of the box, how simple and quick the test is. Pee on a stick, and three minutes later you have your question answered. It was too irresistible. In 1986, as a science writer for the Detroit Free Press , I had researched a story about diagnostic home test kits and raised eyebrows in the features department by keeping a stack of pregnancy tests piled on my desk. The idea of women diagnosing their own pregnancies was still disconcerting back then. The kits themselves contained entire miniature laboratories. They required first morning urine, a willingness to follow complicated instructions, and a half hour of waiting. "Am I going to have a baby?" a woman asked the little chemistry set. The appearance of a ghostly brown ring in a mirror mounted under the test tube meant "Yes." It was like reading tea leaves.     Before the advent of home tests, women handed their urine over to medical technicians to foretell their futures. The Aschheim-Zondek method was developed at a charity hospital in Berlin in 1927. It involved injecting a virgin mouse (later a rabbit or a toad) with the urine of a possibly pregnant woman and then dissecting the animal to see whether it had ovulated. If so, the test was positive. This took weeks. Before Aschheim-Zondek, women relied on their own bodies to tell them they were pregnant. For some, this could take months. Now, a positive pregnancy test means that two colored lines appear on a plastic stick in less time than it takes to brush your teeth.     I note the starting time on my watch, and then very deliberately look out the window. Across the parking lot is the dormitory where I lost my virginity. Beyond the dorm is the old science building where I spent most of my waking hours--studying invertebrate zoology, comparative anatomy, organic chemistry. Somewhere in there was the embryology lab where I once successfully transplanted the wing bud of a chick embryo. It was strange really--to have begun one's sexual life in the midst of an intense intellectual immersion into reproductive biology. I had spent my days poring over micrographs of fetal cross sections, completely humbled by the operatic beauty of it all, and my nights in sticky dormitory couplings, actively trying to prevent sperm and egg from finding each other. This all took place in an age that now seems so fleeting one almost doubts it ever really existed: the handful of years between Roe v. Wade in 1973 and the advent of AIDS in the early 1980s, that brief time when sex did not hold between its teeth the red rose of either ruin or death. Now I have returned--married, contraceptively unprotected, and twice as old as I was when I became semiskilled at prenatal chicken surgery.     The snow falls harder. Already the quadrangle's sward of brown grass is buried.     Am I pregnant? It is an old, old question. How many women have asked it before me? How many women right now are standing at windows waiting for urine-soaked sticks to turn color? Some are praying not to see lines. Some are trying to will them into existence. Am I pregnant? At this particular moment I'm not sure what answer I'm hoping for. Mostly I'm unnerved by the ease of the experiment I'm conducting, as though such a venerable and terrifying question should demand an animal sacrifice, or at least intricate and difficult operations. I reread the instruction sheet. I notice it refers to the plastic stick as "the wand."     I guess that about a minute has passed. Two more to go. To avoid looking at my watch, I decide to think about the menstrual cycle. Reviewing the inside of the human body is a habit of mine, my own private form of meditation. Once, I stayed in a London hotel that became the unintended site of a terrorist attack. While being assembled, a bomb exploded in a room across the courtyard from my own, killing its makers and a sleeping woman next door. In the days that followed, I traced over and over in my mind's eye the passage of venous and arterial blood through the heart's four chambers. It was a way of slowing down my own heart--and not replaying the image of windows shattering.     So, the menstrual cycle.     At the end of a period, the lining of the uterus is thin and bare--like a layer of silt left behind after flood waters have receded. The ovaries, too, are smooth and quiet. Then, high in the brain, the pituitary gland begins to drizzle into the bloodstream a substance called follicle stimulating hormone. True to its name, the hormone awakens in one or the other ovary a whole choir of follicles. Like bubbles, they rise to the surface in unison. Each one is a sack that holds a single human egg. Typically, only one follicle will ultimately surrender its singular possession, but all participate in the task of turning testosterone into estrogen, and it is this collective effort that makes the next step possible.     The assembled estrogen seeps from the follicle-studded surface of the ovary and swirls around in the bloodstream. Some reaches the brain, and, in a second round of call and response, the pituitary gland replies by releasing back into the blood another substance called luteinizing hormone. Like the initial hormone that set the whole process in motion, this, too, is received by the ovary, and it induces one of the swollen follicles to break through the ovarian surface. An egg is delivered out into the headwaters of the fallopian tube. Ovulation. All this in less than two weeks.     The faucet drips. The radiator hisses and bangs into action. I guess that another minute has passed. If I look down at my watch, I'll see "the wand," so I keep my eyes on the falling snow.     It's easy to think of the egg as a little gondola floating serenely down the Venetian canal of the fallopian tube, but this is not quite right. I remember the textbook case of the young woman who lost an ovary and a fallopian tube to surgery. Unfortunately, her remaining ovary and tube were located on opposite sides from each other. To the amazement of all concerned, she got pregnant anyway. Under the influence of estrogen, fallopian tubes move. They stretch, and they bend, and their mouths are actively attracted to ovulating eggs, a drawing power that apparently extends even across the continent of the pelvis. Moreover, once the egg is captured, a fallopian tube has muscles and cilia that ferry it downstream. This is not to say the tube does all the paddling. A living egg denuded of its outer coating will not move. Fallopian transport is a mutual affair, and something in the egg itself assists in the journey. No one knows exactly what.     I wonder what time it is. Down in the parking lot, the last of my students are negotiating their way through rows of cars. But I am not ready yet to consult the plastic oracle on the sink.     During the next three or four days, the floodplain of the uterus is completely transformed. Its flat endometrial lining rises and thickens. Spiral arteries coil through it like snakes. The deeper layers swell with starch-filled glands, and the surface crawls with immune cells. The elixir responsible for this luxuriant growth is the hormone progesterone, which trickles into the bloodstream from the ovarian follicle that released the ovulated egg. Once its solo performance is over, the emptied-out follicle does not sit down with the rest of the choir. Instead, it balls up, turns yellow, and begins secreting hormones. Called the corpus luteum, it is this new gland that turns the interior landscape of the uterus into a lush marshland.     Now we come to the crossroads, the crux of the matter, the source of my lady-or-the-tiger inquiry. An ovulated, unfertilized human egg has a lifespan of just twelve to twenty-four hours. Forty-eight hours, tops. If it dies a maiden, its journey ends. The yellow moon of the corpus luteum soon wanes. As progesterone levels fall, the root ends of the spiral arteries constrict, and the whole endometrium blanches with the loss of blood flow. The starchy pools evaporate. The curly stalks of the spiral arteries senesce. White blood cells infiltrate. All that is left is the denouement of menstruation: the base of the spiral arteries reopens and a surge of fresh blood carries the dying tissue away. In the last twenty-five years I've already gone through several hundred rounds of flooding and renewal. The almanac of the uterus is steadying.     If, on the other hand, something else has happened during the trip down the tunnel--that subject of seventh-grade film strips and intense theological argument--then our story changes. If a living zygote emerges from the far end of the fallopian tube, then the rest of my life is going to be very different.     When an egg is fertilized by a sperm in the upper reaches of the fallopian tube, the first cell division happens in about twelve hours. Four days later, as it bobs out into the womb's delta, there are fifty-eight cells, arranged in a cluster like a mulberry. At this point, a bubble of fluid begins to fill one side of the ball of multiplying cells, and the outermost cells on the other side fuse together. Between the two is a teardrop of cells destined to become the embryo. The bubble is the amnion, the fused part the placenta. One week after the egg's successful affair with the sperm, the whole unit sinks into the endometrial marsh in a process called implantation. The fused cells push long, amoeba-like fingers deep into the uterine lining while secreting digestive enzymes that facilitate its burial. In response, the tips of the spiral arteries break open and spurt like geysers. Thus, life begins in a pool of blood.     Twelve days after conception--that's about where I would be now, if indeed I am there at all--the uterine lining has already grown over the point of entry, and the embryonic placenta has sent siphoning hoses into the bloody lagoons beneath. Equally important, it has begun the manufacture of a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin--HCG--which spills into the mother's capillaries and circulates until it reaches the ovaries. HCG stops the menstrual cycle at summer solstice. It does so by commuting the monthly death sentence of the corpus luteum. Estrogen and progesterone therefore keep flowing from the ovary in ever larger quantities. The uterine lining is not shed but becomes ever more overgrown. More and more spiral arteries wind upward and break open to feed the new life buried there. Immune cells surround it and offer their protection.     HCG is the hormone that pregnancy kits attempt to detect. If it is present in blood, it is present in urine. If it is present in urine, it can be poured over plastic sticks embedded with antibodies. If the antibodies have been extracted from mice previously exposed to the hormones of pregnant women, then they will bind to the HCG in the urine. If the antibodies can be made to change color once they are so bound, then pregnancy is made visible. If I am pregnant, then I should be able to see it. Now.     I look at my watch. Five minutes! I look down at the stick. Two lavender lines. Unmistakable. Now there are two of us. And I am late for class. Chapter Two Hunger Moon February The season's only snowfall melts and then freezes, cruelly, into pleated sheets of ice that last for weeks. Bundled up, I carry my secret with me, imagining the baby (the baby!) as a lavender thread caught within a plush red carpet. The pregnancy seems unreal. I still look the same, feel the same, eat, sleep, and think the same. Like everyone who is not pregnant, I skate gingerly across the ice, head down, arms out, in my daily circuits to class, library, home, and back. Except that I am overcome with a new sense of urgency. I begin reading embryology texts again. I also collect a few popular guidebooks for pregnant women.     I quickly learn that embryologists and obstetricians speak two different languages and utilize two different calendars for chronicling the passage of unfolding events. One is a fortnight ahead of the other. The embryological timetable uses the moment of fertilization as its starting point. This seems sensible, and it is the system I am used to. By the embryologists' accounting, a human pregnancy is thirty-eight weeks long. More or less.     The obstetricians, however, begin the clock with the first day of the woman's last menstrual period. By their method, gestation is an even forty weeks. Their argument for adding two weeks to the beginning of pregnancy is that the fertilization is an unknowable point in time, whereas the onset of menstruation is subject to data collection--either because it has been dutifully recorded in a woman's week-at-a-glance appointment book or because it can be deduced with a little reflection: "Let's see. I was just stepping onto the subway platform when I realized my period had started. That was the day I had planned to go Christmas shopping, so it must have been Monday, the twenty-first." The assumption is that menstruation, on average, precedes ovulation and therefore conception by fourteen days. This is not an unreasonable system either. In fact, it's very practical. Using the obstetrical calendar, a date of birth can be quickly predicted by subtracting three months from the date of last menstruation and adding seven days.     The problem with the obstetrical method is that it pretends a woman is pregnant two weeks before the egg boat has even left the ovarian dock. This is the fiction the whole system hangs on. The surreal result is that a newly pregnant woman is fast-forwarded in time: one short week after a missed menstrual period she is said to be five weeks pregnant.     For a while, I walk around translating the obstetrical calendar into the embryological one I am familiar with. The obstetrician I choose from the Yellow Pages of the phone book is first interested in seeing me when I am about eight weeks pregnant--by which he means six weeks since I actually became pregnant. The pregnancy advice books note that morning sickness often sets in at six weeks, by which they mean four weeks. Finally, I give in and adopt the new, accelerated way of marking time. In some ways, it more closely mirrors the experience of pregnancy discovery. Learning I am pregnant is like crossing the International Date Line. All of a sudden, time skips forward.     Jeff feels the new time sense, too--ever since the afternoon two weeks ago when I handed him the tiny wand, tattooed with its pair of colored lines. Standing in his sculpture studio, he took it and turned it over slowly.     "Is it a thermometer?"     I shook my head.     "Is it ... a clock?"     This was a response I hadn't expected.     "Yes, in a way." I laughed, sure I had misled him. But objects are his medium. He wasn't thrown off by my words. He looked again.     "Are you pregnant? Does this say you're pregnant?"     I nodded furiously, and then we were hugging and laughing. And then I cried, and Jeff held his head in his hands. And then we walked home in the snow with the cars crunching slowly by us, and began to make dinner in an already darkening kitchen, and by the time we had finished, it was truly dark and we sat together quietly like that for a long time, feeling the hours of the short winter days flying by us and pressing behind us at the same time. Two weeks later, we are flipping pages in our date books and comparing our various plans for art shows, book projects, travel, teaching commitments. My due date is October 2. We pencil it in our calendars as though it were some kind of deadline for a grant application.     "You know, it's only a guess. It could be four weeks early. It could be two weeks late."     "I know."     "Only twelve percent of women actually give birth on their due dates."     "Really?"     Silence.     "Let's just take things one step at a time. That's what you always say, right?"     "I know."     Silence.     "Do you think I should cancel my trip to Toronto?"     "Why? It's only a few weeks from now."     "It's expensive."     Future time increasingly seems like some kind of finite resource, like coal or aluminum ore, that must be inventoried, processed, allocated, bankrolled. This kind of stocktaking is new for us. I wonder if all adults who are parents think this way.     I start paying attention to the silver maples outside the windows of the faculty guest house where we are living. Acer saccharinum. It's a fast-growing tree. Homeowners plant them when they want shade in a hurry, but their crowns are brittle and come down quickly in windstorms. Against a gray February sky, their bare, pointy branches are pencil sketches of themselves. In early spring, pom-poms of tiny flowers will open from lateral buds and shower sidewalks and car windshields with chartreuse confetti. Soon after, deeply cut, silvery white leaves will unfurl. Then the helicopters of winged seeds will whirl down and lie topsy turvy in the summer grass. Finally, the leaves will roll up into dry, papery tubes and these too will float down so they can be raked into heaps of ashy lace. But before these leaves fall--if all goes well--I will have a baby. October 2.     I peer more closely at the hunched-up leaf buds paired along the twigs, barely visible, barely there at all. In February, October does not seem possible. Nothing except February seems possible in February--not the wind travels of pollen, not the making of seed helicopters from flower tassels, not the appearance of fancy leaves from the sides of cold twigs, not the formation of babies from menstrual blood. Organogenesis is the formation of body parts. It takes place in the month between weeks six and ten, as the obstetricians date it. By the time it is over, the embryo is the length of a paper clip, and, by definition, all the organs and structures of the body are present in "a grossly recognizable form." At week eleven of pregnancy, no further assembly is required: the embryo is knighted a fetus and simply grows bigger until it is ready for birth, when it weighs about the same as a gallon of milk.     Of all the biological processes I've ever studied--from photosynthesis to echolocation--organogenesis is, hands down, the most fantastical. Sometimes it seems like a magic show. At other times it's like origami, the formation of elegant structures from the folding of flat sheets. It also involves cellular wanderings worthy of Odysseus. No single metaphor can describe it. It certainly isn't like taking a lump of clay and molding a little head from one end and legs and feet from the other.     The events of weeks four and five prepare the way. While still sinking down into the uterine lining, the inner cell mass flattens out into a bilaminar, or two-layered, disc. The edges grow out and begin to curve around in opposite directions until the disc is surrounded by two slightly flattened balls. Then it gets complicated. An opaque line begins to form down the middle of the disc's top layer. At one end of the line, a bump rises up like a miniature volcano with a tiny crater at its summit. This line is called the primitive streak, the bump is called the primitive node, and its crater the primitive pit. These are temporary landmarks in a protean landscape. It is the task of these three structures to send moving cells in the right direction. The primitive streak is a kind of cave door that opens into a hidden space between the two cell layers. In a great exodus, cells from the top layer stream through the streak and fan out. Now there are three layers. By the end of week five, its work finished, the primitive streak is already fading from sight. With this, organogenesis commences.     The disc's three layers are the original tribes of Israel. All body parts originate from one of them, but it is not always obvious which organ comes from which. For example, it makes a certain amount of sense that hair should derive from the outer layer (ectoderm), muscles from the middle layer (mesoderm), and the bowel from the inner one (endoderm). But why should the vagina trace its ancestry back to the mesoderm while the more external bladder originates from the endoderm? Or why should the brain, like the skin, arise from cells in the ectoderm? Trying to decode these aspects of embryology once brought me to the brink of despair.     The trick to understanding how it all comes to be is to trace the lineage of each tissue layer from start to finish. This is like learning all the begats of St. Matthew: the ectoderm gives rise to the primordial epithelium, which gives rise to the proctodeal epithelium, which gives rise to the stomodeal epithelium, which gives rise to the enamel of the teeth. With each generation, the structures change shape and get more elaborate. Cylinders form as the ends of flat sheets grow together. At one point, the whole embryo folds laterally. Organogenesis begins with three flat layers and, one week later, produces a coiled, segmented object that looks like an architectural detail on the end of a stair banister. Three weeks and a few more folds later, a "grossly recognizable" human being resides in the wetlands of the uterus.     What seems like sleight-of-hand work is actually governed by two key embryological principles. One is migration. The other is induction. (Continues...) Excerpted from HAVING FAITH by Sandra Steingraber. Copyright © 2001 by Sandra Steingraber. Excerpted by permission. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.

Table of Contents

Prefacep. ix
Part I
1 Old Moonp. 5
2 Hunger Moonp. 11
3 Sap Moonp. 29
4 Egg Moonp. 56
5 Mother's Moonp. 77
6 Rose Moonp. 103
7 Hay Moonp. 133
8 Green Corn Moonp. 153
9 Harvest Moonp. 177
Part II
10 Mammap. 203
11 Loaves and Fishesp. 224
12 The View from the Topp. 249
Afterwordp. 284
Source Notesp. 288
Acknowledgmentsp. 329
Further Resourcesp. 331
Indexp. 333
About the Authorp. 342