Cover image for Effective succession planning : ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within
Effective succession planning : ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within
Rothwell, William J., 1951-
Personal Author:
Second edition.
Publication Information:
New York : AMACOM ; London : McGraw-Hill, [2001]

Physical Description:
338 pages ; 26 cm
Format :


Call Number
Material Type
Home Location
Item Holds
HD57.7 .R689 2001 Adult Non-Fiction Central Closed Stacks

On Order



Since 1994 Effective Succession Planning has been helping readers develop a strong succession program -- and avoid the disruption (maybe even disaster) that can result when key employees move on unexpectedly.Now, with many sections of totally new material and extensive updates throughout, this indispensable guide is the most comprehensive resource on succession planning available. Readers will find a wealth of information on how to: -- Plan and implement a systematic program, following a proven model-- Identify competencies and clarify values for both planning and managing a succession program-- Assess current and future needs and resources-- Apply online and high-tech approaches to succession planning and management programs, and more.

Author Notes

William J. Rothwell, Ph.D., SPHR (1951-present) was born in Springfield, IL. His website is, and you can see his videos on YouTube by searching on YouTube for WilliamJRothwell. He is currently a professor at The Pennsylvania State University, University Park campus and is also President of Rothwell & Associates, Inc, a consulting firm. He is a frequent conference keynote speaker and seminar presenter. His wife is Marcelina V. Rothwell, President of Greenhills Village Retirement and Assisted Living Residence in State College, PA (see His daughter is Candice S. Rothwell and his son his Froilan Perucho. Reach William at




What Is Succession Planning

and Management?

Six Ministudies:

Can You Solve These Succession Problems?

How is your organization handling succession planning and management (SP&M)?

Read the following vignettes and, on a separate sheet, describe how your organization

would solve the problem presented in each. If you can offer an effective solution to

all the problems in the vignettes, then your organization may already have an effective

SP&M program in place; if not, your organization may have an urgent need to devote

more attention to succession issues.

Vignette 1

An airplane crashes in the desert, killing all on board. Among the passengers are

several top managers of Acme Engineering, a successful consulting firm. When the

vice president of human resources at Acme is summoned to the phone to receive the

news, she gasps, turns pale, looks blankly at her secretary, and breathlessly voices

the first question that enters her mind: ''Now who's in charge?''

Vignette 2

On the way to a business meeting in Bogota, Colombia, the CEO of Normal Fixtures

(a maker of ceramic bathroom fixtures) is seized and held for ransom by freedom

fighters. They demand U.S. $1 million within 72 hours for his life, or they will kill

him. Members of the corporate board are beside themselves with concern.

Vignette 3

Georgina Myers, supervisor of a key assembly line, has just called in sick after two

years of perfect attendance. She handles all purchasing and production scheduling in

the small plant, and overseeing the assembly line. The production manager, Mary

Rawlings, does not know how the plant will function absent this key employee, who

carries in her head essential and proprietary knowledge of production operations. She

is sure that production will be lost today because Georgina has no trained backup.

Vignette 4

Marietta Diaz was not promoted to supervisor. She is convinced that she is a victim

of racial and sexual discrimination. Her manager, Wilson Smith, assures her that that

is not the case. He explains his reason to her: ''You just don't have the skills and

experience to do the work. Gordon Hague, who was promoted, already possesses

those skills. The decision was based strictly on individual merit and supervisory job

requirements.'' But Marietta remains troubled. How, she wonders, could Gordon

have acquired those skills in his previous nonsupervisory job?

Vignette 5

Morton Wile is about to retire as CEO of Multiplex Systems. For several years he has

been grooming L. Carson Adams as his successor. Adams has held the posts of executive

vice president and chief operating officer, and his performance has been exemplary

in those positions. Wile has long been convinced that Adams will make an

excellent CEO. But, as his retirement date approaches, Wile has recently been hearing

questions about his choice. Several division vice presidents and members of the board

of directors have asked him privately how wise it is to allow Adams to take over, since

(it is whispered) he has had a long-term, high-profile extramarital affair with his

secretary and is rumored to be an alcoholic. How, they wonder, can he be chosen to

assume the top leadership position when burdened with such personal baggage? Wile

is loathe to talk to Adams because he does not want to police anyone's personal life.

But he is sufficiently troubled to think about initiating an executive search for a CEO

candidate from outside the company.

Vignette 6

Linda Childress is general manager of a large consumer products plant in the Midwest.

She has helped her plant weather many storms. The first was a corporatesponsored

voluntary early retirement program, which began eight years ago. Because

program Linda lost her most experienced workers, and among its effects on the plant

were costly work redistributions, retraining, retooling, and automation. The second

storm was a forced layoff that occurred five years ago, driven by fierce foreign competition

in consumer products. The layoff cost Linda fully one-fourth of her most

recently hired workers and many middle managers, professionals, and technical employees.

It also led to a net loss of protected labor groups in the plant's workforce to

a level well below what had taken the company ten years of ambitious efforts to

achieve. Other consequences were increasingly aggressive union actions in the plant;

isolated incidents of violence against management personnel by disgruntled workers;

growing evidence of theft, pilferage, and employee sabotage; and skyrocketing absenteeism

and turnover rates.

The third storm swept the plant on the heels of the layoff. Just three years ago

corporate headquarters announced a company-wide process improvement program.

Its aims were to improve product quality and customer service, build worker involvement

and empowerment, reduce scrap rates, and meet competition from abroad.

Although the goals were laudable, the program was greeted with skepticism because

it was introduced so soon after the layoff. Many employees--and supervisors--voiced

the opinion that ''corporate headquarters is using process improvement to clean up

the mess they created by chopping heads first and asking questions about work reallocation

later.'' However, because job security is an issue of paramount importance to

everyone at the plant, the external consultant sent by corporate headquarters to introduce

the process improvement program received grudging cooperation. But the process

improvement initiative has created side effects of its own. One is that executives,

middle managers, and supervisors are uncertain about their roles and the results

expected of them. Another is that employees, pressured to do better work with fewer

resources, are complaining bitterly about compensation or other reward practices

they feel do not reflect their increased responsibilities, efforts, or productivity. And a

fourth storm is brewing. Corporate executives, it is rumored, are considering moving

all production facilities offshore to take advantage of reduced labor and employee

health-care insurance costs. Many employees are worried this is really not a rumor

but a fact.

Against this backdrop, Linda has noticed that it is becoming more difficult to find

backups for hourly workers and to ensure leadership continuity in the plant's middleand

top-management ranks. Although the company has long conducted an annual

succession planning and management ritual, in which standardized forms, supplied

by corporate headquarters, are sent out to managers by the plant's human resources

department, Linda cannot remember when the forms were used during a talent

search. The major reason, Linda believes, is that managers and employees have rarely

followed through on the Individual Development Plans (IDPs) established to prepare

people for advancement opportunities.

Excerpted from Effective Succession Planning: Ensuring Leadership Continuity and Building Talent from Within by William J. Rothwell All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.