Cover image for Pride before the fall : the trials of Bill Gates and the end of the Microsoft era
Pride before the fall : the trials of Bill Gates and the end of the Microsoft era
Heilemann, John, 1966-
Personal Author:
First edition.
Publication Information:
New York : HarperCollins, [2001]

Physical Description:
ix, 246 pages, 8 unnumbered pages of plates : illustrations ; 25 cm
Format :


Call Number
Material Type
Home Location
Item Holds
KF228.U5 H45 2001 Adult Non-Fiction Non-Fiction Area

On Order



This is the definitive investigation of the most important business story of our time. In riveting style, Pride Before the Fall uncovers the truth behind the headlines -- including the hidden roles of Silicon Valley's most powerful men in shattering Microsoft's aura of invincibility and the climate of fear that held an industry in its thrall. Heilemann's groundbreaking book is based on extensive and exclusive interviews with Bill Gates and his second-in-command at Microsoft, Steve Ballmer; the Justice Department's then-assistant attorney general Joel Klein; chief government counsel David Boies; Intel chairman Andy Grove and other leading high-tech executives; and scores of lesser-known but pivotal players. Heilemann details exactly how the high-tech kingpins whose companies Gates tried to destroy or strong-arm (Netscape, Apple, Sun Microsystems, even Intel) worked behind the scenes to help the government bring Microsoft down. And he explores the lasting damage that the trial has inflicted on the first great empire of the new economy.

Author Notes

John Heilemann is the national political correspondent and columnist for New York magazine. He is a former staff writer for the New Yorker, the Economist, and Wired.

He is the author of Pride Before the Fall: The Trials of Bill Gates and the End of the Microsoft Era, Game Change: Obama and the Clintons, McCain and Palin, and the Race of a Lifetime and Double Down: Game Change 2012.

(Bowker Author Biography)

Reviews 1

Publisher's Weekly Review

HNavigating the myriad twists and turns of the landmark antitrust suit against Microsoft, Heilemann forges a gripping, breakneck account of contemporary law applied to business conduct, peopled with rival visionaries, guardians of the public interest and brilliant trial lawyers. A former staff writer for the New Yorker and the Economist, Heilemann covered the case as a special correspondent for Wired in November; this is an expanded version of that extensive article. Having gained the trust of almost every major player, Heilemann vividly depicts the adversaries and their positions. In July 2000, Bill Gates told him, "We believe that what we've done is absolutely pro-competitive, and it's our right to stick up for that." Joel Klein, the Justice Department's assistant attorney general during the trial, is equally forthcoming: "What we found in Microsoft was a serious pattern of practices and behavior that... was predatory, lawless, and indefensible." Heilemann's insight into the legal process and his analysis of Gates's videotaped deposition, overseen by chief government counsel David Boies (now representing Vice-President Gore on ballot issues), are themselves worth the price of admission. Wherever readers' sympathies lie, Heilemann's careful timeline illuminates the points at which the case could have been settled. With journalistic panache, Heilemann explicates the reasons that both sides chose to await the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals in spring 2001. (Jan. 23) Forecast: A major marketing campaign including national print and broadcast coverage as well as author appearances in West Coast cities will raise this title's profile. Display alongside U.S. v. Microsoft: The Inside Story of the Landmark Case by New York Times reporters Joel Brinkley and Steve Lohr could draw people to both titles, with the edge probably going to Heilemann's book. (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved



Pride Before the Fall The Trials of Bill Gates and the End of the Microsoft Era Chapter One The Case That Almost Wasn't Though no one at the company knew it at the time, Microsoft's troubles with the Department of justice began in earnest in the spring of 1996, with the literary aspirations of two amateur authors in Silicon Valley. Since 1990, when the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) opened the first government probe into the firm's practices, Microsoft had been under the antitrust microscope more or less constantly; not a year had passed without it receiving at least one civil investigative demand (CID) for documents. As one federal inquiry morphed into the next, Gates and Ballmer gradually came to view the investigations not merely as legal scrutiny but as a kind of proxy warfare (and, later, as nothing less than a vast high-tech conspiracy) instigated by their enemies in the Valley and elsewhere. Yet as suspicious as they were about the source of their regulatory entanglements, Microsoft's leaders could scarcely have dreamed that so much damage would be unleashed by a quiet woman who called herself a "law-and-order Republican," a shrill man who was regarded by some as mildly unhinged, and the book they wrote together a book that was never published in any form, and whose contents would long remain shrouded in secrecy. Susan Creighton and Gary Reback were not, however, your typical wannabe wordsmiths. They were lawyers and antitrust specialists with Silicon Valley's preeminent law firm, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. They were passionate, smart, articulate, and angry. They had been retained by Netscape to tell the world, not to mention the DOJ, about the myriad ways in which Microsoft was endeavoring to drive the pioneering start-up six feet under. And they were rapidly approaching the end of their rope. It was Reback who served as the duo's frontman. Throughout the computer business and the government, he was known as a guy who got paid to complain about Gates the rough Silicon Valley equivalent of drawing a salary for breathing. Over the years, Reback had amassed a client roster that included some of the industry's most prominent firms from Apple and Sun to Borland and Novell, though not all of them admitted it and had earned a reputation as Redmond's most relentless and strident critic. The cover of Wired in August 1997 declared him "Bill Gates's Worst Nightmare." Nightmarish or not, he was a piece of work. A Tennessee-born Jew in his late forties, Reback wore sharp suits, wire-rimmed glasses, and a perpetually pained expression. When he talked about Microsoft which was pretty much constantly his demeanor was fretfulness punctuated with blind outrage. His voice teetered on the edge of whine. "The only thing J. D. Rockefeller did that Bill Gates hasn't done)" Reback would wail, "is use dynamite against his competitors!" Crusader and showboat, egotist and quote machine, he had a taste for avant-garde economic theories and a tendency to level extravagant accusations without much hard proof to back them up. He was, in the strictest sense, a zealot: a man both fanatical and fanatically earnest in his beliefs. Later, when the DOJ decided to go after Microsoft, a government lawyer was assigned to "deal" with Reback. "His heart's in the right place," this lawyer said. "But he's twisted. He leaves me these voicemails in the middle of the night, raving about all kinds of stuff. He really needs some help." History might well have judged Reback a marginal figure, just another Gates-hating ranter, were it not for one inconvenient fact: almost everything he claimed turned out to be true. In Reback, Microsoft faced an adversary with a rare combination of technical savvy and antitrust expertise. As an undergrad at Yale, he had worked his way through school by programming computers for the economics department; as a law student at Stanford, he had studied antitrust under the late William Baxter, who, as the head of the DOJ's antitrust division under Ronald Reagan, would oversee the breakup of AT&T. Susan Creighton recalled, "Gary liked to tell the story of how Baxter once said, 'We want companies to succeed, and when they succeed so well that they become monopolies, we should give them a tickertape parade down Wall Street and then break them up.' I don't know if Baxter actually said that, and if he did say it whether he meant it literally, but Gary thought it sounded pretty good." Reback's history with Microsoft was long, tangled, and not without its ironies. In the early 1980s, he secured for Apple the copyright registration for the Macintosh graphical user interface, a copyright over which Apple would eventually wage a nasty and protracted lawsuit with Microsoft. Not long afterward, a bearded, elfin entrepreneur from Berkeley appeared on Reback's doorstep and asked for help in selling his fledgling software company. The company was called Dynamical Systems Research; the entrepreneur, Nathan Myhrvold. After Apple passed up the deal, Microsoft stepped in, buying Myhrvold's start-up and Myhrvold along with it for $1.5 million. Forever after, Reback would be convinced that this transaction had been pivotal to the rise of Windows, in which Myhrvold played a key role. It was a conclusion that filled Reback with no end of guilt. The lawyer became an anti-Microsoft missionary. As first the FTC and then the DOJ looked into the company, Reback peppered the Feds with briefs alleging a litany of predatory sins. In July 1994, the DOJ sued Microsoft for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, only to drop the suit shortly thereafter and enter into a consent decree with the company. The agreement contained only a few mild curbs on Microsoft's behavior; Gates himself summarized its effect bluntly: "nothing." At the behest of a clutch of Microsoft's rivals in the Valley, who saw the decree as a Potemkin remedy, Reback spearheaded a spirited, but ultimately futile, campaign in federal court to scuttle it. Indeed, all . . . Pride Before the Fall The Trials of Bill Gates and the End of the Microsoft Era . Copyright © by John Heilemann. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold. Excerpted from Pride Before the Fall by John Heilemann All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.

Table of Contents

Prologue: the Humblingp. 1
Chapter 1 The Case That Almost Wasn'tp. 11
Chapter 2 The Accidental Trustbusterp. 27
Chapter 3 The Shadow of the Manp. 41
Chapter 4 Things Fall Apartp. 75
Chapter 5 In the Dockp. 135
Chapter 6 In the Bunkerp. 161
Chapter 7 Showtimep. 173
Chapter 8 Rough Justicep. 199
Chapter 9 Whistling in the Darkp. 221
Chapter 10 The Verdictp. 231
Acknowledgmentsp. 243