Cover image for Lies across America : what our historic sites get wrong
Title:
Lies across America : what our historic sites get wrong
Author:
Loewen, James W.
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
New York : New Press : Distributed by W.W. Norton, [1999]

©1999
Physical Description:
480 pages : illustrations, map ; 24 cm
Language:
English
ISBN:
9781565843448
Format :
Book

Available:*

Library
Call Number
Material Type
Home Location
Status
Central Library E159 .L64 1999 Adult Non-Fiction Central Closed Stacks
Searching...
Central Library E159 .L64 1999 Adult Non-Fiction Non-Fiction Area
Searching...
Central Library E159 .L64 1999 Adult Non-Fiction Central Closed Stacks
Searching...
Julia Boyer Reinstein Library E159 .L64 1999 Adult Non-Fiction Open Shelf
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

The fabulous sequel to the bestselling, award-winning Lies My Teacher Told Me.


Author Notes

Social scientist and professor James Loewen is an outspoken critic of "feel-good" history. In his book "Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American Textbook Got Wrong" (1996) he debunks the myths and exposes the omissions he feels are taught in the nation's high schools.

Disturbed by his college students' lack of knowledge of history and concerned about minority misconceptions, Loewen spent two years at the Smithsonian analyzing 12 leading history texts and 11 years writing this best-selling indictment of history teaching. Loewen believes that controversy has been removed from classrooms in favor of blind patriotism. "Any history book that celebrates, rather than examines, our heritage has the by-product, intended or not, of alienating all those in the 'out group', those who have not become affluent, and denies them a tool for understanding their own group's lack of success."

Loewen's other books include ""Mississippi: Conflict and Change" (1974, rev. 1980), a revisionist history of the state written with a coalition of students and faculty at Tougaloo College, Mississippi; "Mississippi Chinese: Between Black and White" (1971), a study of this minority's role in society; "Social Science in the Courtroom" (1983), based on the author's experiences as an expert witness in civil rights cases and "The Truth About Columbus: A Subversively True Poster Book For A Dubiously Celebratory Occasion" (1992). In addition, the author is a frequent contributor to professional publications, sometimes under the pseudonym James Lyons.

James W. Loewen was born February 6, 1942 in Decatur, Illinois and was educated at Carleton College (B.A., 1964) and Harvard University (M.A, 1967; Ph.D., 1968). He was a sociologist and teacher specializing in race relations at Tougaloo College, Mississippi from 1968 to 1974.

(Bowker Author Biography)


Reviews 1

Library Journal Review

A Confederate war memorial in Helena, MT? America's most toppled monument? These are only a couple of the things Loewen discovers during his travels around this highly monumented country. This book takes an often amusing look at the strange and sometimes sinister motivation behind the creation of many of America's historic sites. Good questions to ask when seeing something as simple as a roadside plaque or as complex as Mark Twain's home town are "Who made this?," "When?," and especially "Why?" The answers often reveal attempts to misinform or push certain cultural or political agendas. As the title implies, Loewen (Lies My Teacher Told Me, The Truth About Columbus) views official history with a certain skepticism that can be entertaining. Recommended for public libraries.ÄJoseph Toschik, Half Moon Bay P.L., CA (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.


Excerpts

Excerpts

Excerpt THE FAR WEST 1. The Tallest Mountain -- The Silliest Naming ALASKA Denali (Mt. McKinley) Since people probably reached Alaska before any other part of the Western Hemisphere, they probably named North America's tallest mountain thousands of years ago. They didn't call it Mt. McKinley.     Replacing Native American names with those of European Americans is a form of cultural imperialism. The practice declares that the new rulers of the landscape can afford to ignore what Native names mean and connote in favor of new names that typically have no relation to what is named.     Low-profile conflicts have raged for many years between those who want to change the names of localities and geographic features back to their original Native names, and those who want them named for European American people, towns, or words. To some degree this is a contest between Native Americans and European Americans, but European Americans are usually found on both sides of the arguments. The battles might also be characterized as between traditionalists and those desiring change, except that both parties claim to have tradition on their side. Denali, or Mt. McKinley, dramatically embodies these disputes about names all across America, not only because it is such a dramatic place but also because the controversy at Denali has gone on for more than twenty-five years.     William A. Dickey renamed the peak, the tallest point in North America, Mt. McKinley in 1896. Why he got to name it is hard to fathom. Dickey had come to Alaska spurred by discoveries of gold in Cook Inlet. With three companions he made it to Talkeetna and saw Denali, "the great one" in the language of the nearby Tanaina Indians. According to C. H. Merriam, testifying before the U.S. Geographical Board in 1917, "The right of the discoverer to name geographical features has never been questioned," but Dickey was no discoverer. Native people had discovered the mountain thousands of years earlier. Even if only white people "discover," Russians saw it in the 1770s or 1780s and named it Bulshaia Gora, "big mountain." Even if only English-speaking white people "discover," George Vancouver saw Denali in 1794. Dickey was not even the first white American to see it; other Americans had preceded him by a quarter century.     Dickey had no serious reason to name the mountain as he did. William McKinley had not yet been martyred when he received the honor; indeed he had not even been elected president. Nor had McKinley ever been to the mountain, or even to Alaska. William Dickey favored conservative fiscal policies, while most people in the West wanted to expand the amount of money in circulation by minting more silver coins and certificates. Dickey was irritated by arguments he had lost with "free silver" partisans on his trip and decided to retaliate by naming Denali after the gold standard champion.     "The original naming was little more than a joke," according to George R. Stewart, author of American Place-Names . From the first, some people preferred the Native name, and Dickey's frivolous reason for choosing McKinley gave them ammunition. Nevertheless, probably because he wrote about his trip in the New York Sun , Dickey's choice began to catch on. McKinley defeated William Jennings Bryan in 1896, so at least the mountain turned out to be named after a president, and, when McKinley was shot in Buffalo in 1901, after a martyred president.     Today however, many Americans consider the Native name more melodious and object to "McKinley" on aesthetic grounds--as if the Mississippi River had been renamed for, say, Zachary Taylor. Others support Native efforts to gain more acceptance, including better recognition on the landscape. "It's time we listened to the Native people of Alaska," declared Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska in 1991. "This mountain is the largest in North America. It was named by the Natives long before we arrived."     Nationally, a lone congressman from Ohio prevents the renaming of the mountain. In 1975, Rep. Ralph Regula from Canton, William McKinley's hometown, blocked a compromise proposed by the Alaska legislature to name the mountain Denali and leave the national park surrounding it named for McKinley. Five years later the National Park Service agreed to a compromise Regula couldn't block: it changed the name of Mt. McKinley National Park to Denali National Park, but the mountain stayed Mt. McKinley. This resolution proved unstable, however. Finding its Native lobby more persuasive than Ohio's McKinley lobby, Alaska changed its name for the mountain to Denali, relegating the 25th president to the parenthetical statement, "(also known as Mt. McKinley)." Regula has found a way to block any change on the national level, however. His aide told me, "The Board of Geographic Names won't change names so long as legislation on the subject is pending. Congressman Regula always has legislation pending." The legislation never gets anywhere, but it suffices to prevent action by the board.     When the Board on Geographic Names was considering a proposal to rename the mountain in 1977, Congressman Regula testified, "This action would be an insult to the memory of President McKinley and to the people of my district and the nation who are so proud of his heritage." But Americans aren't! That's the problem: most Americans don't rank William McKinley very high in the pantheon of presidents. They remember him if at all as a creation of political boss Mark Hanna, beholden to big business, and addicted to high tariffs. He also got us bogged down in a seemingly endless colonial war in the Philippines (25). Such facts do not deter Regula, who portrays McKinley as "a champion of the working class" and credits him for "settlement of the long-standing Spanish-American conflict."     Naturally the congressman's office claims higher principles, not mere local pride, motivate Regula to block renaming the mountain. "The congressman feels that a lot of money goes into maps," emphasized aide Barbara Wainman, "and names shouldn't be changed lightly." Moreover, she noted, if they win Denali, Native groups will want to change other names.     On that last point Wainman is right. Entry 24 tells that Native groups do want to change other names all across America. And American Indians are winning some of these battles. Memphis renamed DeSoto Bluff "Chickasaw Heritage State Park." "Custer's Last Stand" is now "The Little Bighorn Battlefield." Also, the U.S. Board on Geographic Names adopted a policy in 1990 to favor names derived from American Indian, Inuit, and Polynesian languages. Eventually Natives will outlast Ralph Regula and rename Denali. * * * 2. King Kamehameha I, The Roman ! HAWAII Honolulu Kamehameha I was an extraordinary leader. Born on the Big Island of Hawaii about 1758, he died on Kona in 1819. Using his intelligence, courage in man-to-man combat, his own genealogy (very important in traditional Hawaiian culture), diplomacy, Western arms, and capable advisors and underlings, Kamehameha conquered all of the Big Island of Hawaii in the 1790s. He then moved northwest, conquering Maui, Lanai, Molokai, and Oahu. Finally in 1810 by negotiation he was acknowledged king over Kauai, unifying all the Hawaiian Islands for the first time.     Kamehameha's imposing statue stands across South King Street from Iolani Palace in Honolulu. An identical statue stands near his birthplace. A third statue, made from molds prepared from the one in Honolulu, stands indoors in the United States Capitol. Eight and one half feet tall with gold robes, it is "easily the most striking in the National Statuary Hall" in the words of the guidebook for the collection. Kamehameha's likeness can thus be seen on the landscape at more places than that of any other Asian or Pacific Island American.     Only it's not Kamehameha's likeness.     The statue had its origin in 1878 when Walter Gibson, a non-Polynesian member of the Hawaiian legislature, proposed it in connection with the centennial of Hawaii's "discovery" by Captain James Cook. This had a certain logic, since Kamehameha was among the many Hawaiians who had met Cook during his two visits to the islands before he was killed there. The legislature appropriated $10,000 for the project and made Gibson chair of the monument committee, which included native Hawaiian members but soon became a one-man show. Gibson chose Thomas R. Gould, a Boston sculptor, to craft the work.     Gould never went to Hawaii and seems never to have learned what Kamehameha looked like, although several portraits did exist, painted at different points in his life. Photographs of native Hawaiians were mailed to Gould as he worked on the statue in Florence, Italy, but they did not make much impact either. Gould was in Italy, so he made the statue look like an Italian with a long Roman cloak. According to travel writer Hal Glatzer, "The statue is essentially that of a Roman general with dark skin. The features are more Caucasian than Polynesian. The pose, with the right arm extended, palm upturned, is `supposed' to be a welcoming aloha gesture. But it is based on the Roman pose with an upright staff or spear."     David Kalakaua had become king of Hawaii in 1874, and in 1882 Hawaiians finished the Iolani Palace for him. The statue of King Kamehameha I, not ready for the 1878-79 centennial of Cook's visit, was scheduled as part of Kalakaua's belated coronation festivities connected with opening the new palace in 1883. Cast in bronze in Paris and then shipped to Hawaii via Cape Horn, the statue was lost before rounding the Cape when the ship wrecked at the Falkland Islands.     The Hawaiians had insured the statue for $12,000, and with that money they ordered another one. Gould made a copy and sent it off to Hawaii. Before it could get there, however, a ship came into Hawaii with the original! Enterprising Falkland Islanders had recovered it from the sea and sold it to the captain for $500. He sold it to Gibson for $875. Now Hawaii had two statues, and neither looked anything like Kamehameha. The reordered statue was placed in front of Iolani Palace, while the original went up near the northernmost point of the Big Island, near Kamehameha's birthplace.     Making Kamehameha look Roman is a classic example of Eurocentrism. Hawaiians do not look Italian. James King, lieutenant to Captain Cook, said Kamehameha had "as savage a looking face as I ever saw." "Savage" of course was a Eurocentric way of saying "Polynesian"; Hawaiian women found Kamehameha quite attractive. Nevertheless, Native Hawaiian activist Poka Laenui points out that the statues do symbolize how Hawaiians of that era were finding ways to "walk in two worlds"--their own culture and the European-dominated world economy. Hawaii adopted a written constitution and other accoutrements of modern nationhood. Regardless, Europeans were taking over Hawaii as they were taking over Kamehameha's likeness. In 1887, whites forced Kalakaua to sign a constitution supporting white interests. Venereal disease, cholera, influenza, measles, typhoid, smallpox, and other diseases from Europe and Asia, including leprosy which arrived in 1830, decimated the Hawaiians. Hawaii's Native population shrank from perhaps 350,000 when Captain Cook arrived to about 35,000 by 1893. In that year American residents on Hawaii, aided by 162 United States sailors, overthrew Queen Liliuokalani, Kalakaua's successor. It seemed then that Native Hawaiians might disappear from their own country as thoroughly as the likeness of King Kamehameha had from his own statue.     Since then, "pure Hawaiians" have continued to decline in number to about 8,000. In the 1970s and 1980s however, in a development that paralleled Black Power and American Indian movements on the mainland, the number of Hawaiians who identified themselves as Native Hawaiian soared. So has the number of Native Hawaiians learning Hawaiian music, dance, language, crafts, and navigation. In the 1990 census about 140,000 people had substantial Hawaiian ancestry and were identified as Native Hawaiian Although that is only one-eighth of the population of the islands, their numbers continue to increase rapidly. Entry 26 tells of a similar population decline and rebound among Native Americans, and a corresponding rise in the number of those identifying themselves as American Indians. Copyright © 1999 James W. Loewen. All rights reserved.

Table of Contents

In What Ways Were We Warped?p. 15
Some Functions of Public Historyp. 25
The Sociology of Historic Sitesp. 29
Historic Sites are Always a Tale of Two Erasp. 36
Hieratic Scale in Historic Monumentsp. 43
The Far West
1 Alaska Denali (Mt. McKinley): The Tallest Mountain -- The Silliest Namingp. 51
2 Hawaii Honolulu: King Kamehameha I, The Roman!p. 54
3 California Sacramento: The Flat Earth Myth on the West Coastp. 57
4 California Sacramento: Exploiting vs. Exterminating the Nativesp. 62
5 California San Francisco: China Beach Leaves Out the Bad Partsp. 67
6 California Downieville: Killing a Man is Not Newsp. 70
7 Oregon La Grande: Don't "Discover" 'Til You See the Eyes of the Whites!p. 74
8 Washington Cowlitz County: No Communists Here!p. 76
9 Washington Centralia: Using Nationalism to Redefine a Troublesome Statuep. 77
10 Nevada Hickison Summit: What We Know and What We Don't Know about Rock Artp. 81
11 Nevada Nye County: Don't Criticize Big Brotherp. 84
Mountains and Plains States
12 Idaho Almo: Circle The Wagons, Boys -- It's Tourist Seasonp. 89
13 Utah North of St. George: Bad Things Happen in the Passive Voicep. 93
14 Arizona Navajo Reservation: Calling Native Americans Bad Namesp. 99
15 Montana Helena: No Confederate Dead? No Problem! Invent Them!p. 102
16 Wyoming South Pass City: A Woman Shoulda Done It!p. 108
17 Colorado Pagosa Springs: Tall Tales in the Westp. 110
18 Colorado Leadville: Licking the Corporate Hand That Feeds Youp. 113
19 New Mexico Alcalde: The Footloose Statuep. 119
The Great Plains
20 Oklahoma Oklahoma City: The Oklahoma State History Museum Confederate Room Tells No Historyp. 123
21 Kansas Gardner: Which Came First, Wilderness or Civilization?p. 126
22 Nebraska Red Cloud: No Lesbians on the Landscapep. 127
23 South Dakota Brookings: American Indians Only Roved for about a Hundred Yearsp. 130
24 North Dakota Devils Lake: The Devil is Winning, Six to Onep. 133
The Midwest
25 Minnesota St. Paul: "Serving the Cause of Humanity"p. 136
26 Iowa Muscatine: Red Men Only -- No Indians Allowedp. 144
27 Missouri Hannibal: Domesticating Mark Twainp. 148
28 Wisconsin Racine: Not the First Autop. 151
29 Illinois Chicago: America's Most Toppled Monumentp. 152
30 Indiana Graysville: Coming into Indiana Minus a Body Partp. 157
31 Indiana Indianapolis: The Invisible Empire Remains Invisiblep. 161
32 Kentucky Lexington: Putting the He in Herop. 164
33 Kentucky Hodgenville: Abraham Lincoln's Birthplace Cabin -- Built Thirty Years after his Death!p. 166
34 Michigan Dearborn: Honoring a Segregationistp. 170
35 Ohio Delaware: Who Menaced Whom?p. 173
The South
36 Texas Gainesville: "No Nation Rose So White and Fair; None Fell So Free of Crime"p. 177
37 Texas Alba: The Only Honest Sundown Town in the United Statesp. 182
38 Texas Pittsburg: It Never Got Off the Groundp. 186
39 Texas Fredericksburg: The Real War Will Never Get into the War Museumsp. 188
40 Texas Galveston: This Building Used to be a Hardware Storep. 195
41 Arkansas Grant County: Which Came First, the Statue or the Oppression?p. 197
42 Arkansas Little Rock: Men Make History; Women Make Wivesp. 200
43 Louisiana Laplace: Suppressing a Slave Revolt for the Second Timep. 206
44 Louisiana Colfax: Mystifying the Colfax Riot and Lying about Reconstructionp. 210
45 Louisiana New Orleans: The White League Begins to Take a Beatingp. 214
46 Louisiana Baton Rouge: The Toppled "Darky"p. 220
47 Louisiana Fort Jackson: Let Us Now Praise Famous Thievesp. 227
48 Mississippi Hazlehurst: The End of Reconstructionp. 230
49 Mississippi Itta Bena: A Black College Celebrates White Racistsp. 235
50 Alabama Calhoun County: If Russia Can do it, Why Can't We?p. 239
51 Alabama Tuscumbia: Confining Helen Keller under House Arrestp. 243
52 Alabama Scottsboro: Famous Everywhere but at Homep. 246
53 Tennessee Fort Pillow: Remember Fort Pillow!p. 250
54 Tennessee Woodbury: Forrest Rested Herep. 258
55 Georgia Stone Mountain: A Confederate-KKK Shrine Encounters Turbulencep. 261
56 Florida Near Cedar Key: The Missing Town of Rosewoodp. 266
57 South Carolina Beech Island: The Beech Island Agricultural Club Was Hardly What the Marker Impliesp. 268
58 South Carolina Fort Mill: To the Loyal Slavesp. 273
59 South Carolina Columbia: Who Burned Columbia?p. 279
60 North Carolina Bentonville Battlefield: The Last Major Confederate Offensive of The Civil Warp. 288
61 Virginia Alexandria: The Invisible Slave Tradep. 290
62 Virginia Alexandria: The Clash of the Martyrsp. 294
63 Virginia Richmond: "One of the Great Female Spies of all Times"p. 298
64 Virginia Richmond: Slavery and Redemptionp. 302
65 Virginia Richmond: The Liberation of Richmondp. 305
66 Virginia Richmond: Abraham Lincoln Walks through Richmondp. 310
67 Virginia Appomattox: Getting Even the Numbers Wrongp. 317
68 Virginia Stickleyville: A Sign of Good Breedingp. 320
The Atlantic States
69 West Virginia Union: Is California West of the Alleghenies?p. 325
70 District of Columbia Jefferson Memorial: Juxtaposing Quotations to Misrepresent a Founding Fatherp. 327
71 District of Columbia Lincoln Memorial: A Product of Its Time and All Timep. 333
72 Maryland Hampton: "No History To Tell"p. 338
73 Delaware Reliance: The Reverse Underground Railroadp. 352
74 Pennsylvania Philadelphia: Telling Amusing Incidents for the Touristsp. 357
75 Pennsylvania Valley Forge: George Washington's Desperate Prayerp. 362
76 Pennsylvania Lancaster: "You're Here to See the House"p. 367
77 Pennsylvania Gettysburg: South Carolina Defines the Civil War in 1965p. 371
78 Pennsylvania Philadelphia: Remember The "Splendid Little War" -- Forget the Tawdry Larger Warsp. 377
79 Pennsylvania Philadelphia: Celebrating Illegal Submarine Warfarep. 381
80 New Jersey Trenton: The Pilgrims and Religious Freedomp. 383
81 New York Manhattan: Making Native Americans Look Stupidp. 385
82 New York Alabama: Which George Washington?p. 389
83 New York North Elba: John Brown's Plaque Puts Blacks at the Bottom!p. 390
84 New York Manhattan: The Union League Club: Traitors to Their Own Causep. 394
85 New York Manhattan: Selective Memory at USS Intrepidp. 404
New England
86 Connecticut Darien: Omitting the Town's Continuing Claim to Famep. 408
87 Massachusetts Boston: The Problem of the Commonp. 413
88 Massachusetts Amherst: Celebrating Genocidep. 415
89 Massachusetts Boston: What a Monument Ought to Bep. 419
90 Vermont Burlington: Shards of Minstrelsy on a Far-North Campusp. 425
91 New Hampshire Peterborough and Dublin: Local History Warsp. 430
92 New Hampshire Concord: "Effective Political Leader"p. 433
93 Rhode Island Block Island: "Settlement" Means Fewer People!p. 436
94 Rhode Island Warren and Barrington: Fighting over the "Good Indian"p. 438
95 Maine Bar Harbor: At Last -- An Accurate Markerp. 442
Snowplow Revisionismp. 443
Getting into a Dialogue with the Landscapep. 447
Appendices
A Selecting the Sitesp. 455
B Ten Questions to Ask at a Historic Sitep. 459
C Twenty Candidates For "Toppling"p. 460

Google Preview